All articles
9 min read

UX Research Methods: How Many People Each One Needs in India

Choose UX research methods by question and stage, then size them by people: 5 to 6 interviews to start, 5 users per usability round, 5 to 12 for a small diary study.

By Jitendra Kumar Nirala, Founder · Updated 1 Nov 2026

A researcher and a participant sit across a small table in a bright office, talking while the participant holds a smartphone.

Key takeaways

  • Pick the method by what you need to know (why, whether it works, or how many), then size it by method. Raise the number only when your users differ from one another.
  • Count segments, not only people. Groups that behave differently, such as a city and language pair, each need their own participants.
  • Do not recruit only from urban, always-connected channels. Connection density is much lower in rural India, so put at least one segment outside the metros if your product serves them.
  • Plan backwards from completed sessions. Divide by the share who show up, then by the share of screened people who qualify, to get the number to screen.
In this article
  1. 1Which UX research methods fit your question and product stage?
  2. 2How many participants do interviews, diary studies, field visits and usability tests need?
  3. 3Does recruiting online in India skew your research sample?
  4. 4How do you work out how many people to recruit and screen?
  5. 5What should you check before UX fieldwork starts in Indian cities?
  6. 6What does a moderated UX study with Qualfacto look like?
  7. 7Frequently asked questions

A method guide can tell you that interviews explain why people do things and that A/B tests (two versions shown to different groups) count how many do them. It cannot tell you whether to book 5 people or 30, or whether those people can be reached in your city and language. That second question is the one your plan has to answer.

The method follows from your question and the stage your product is at. The number of participants follows from the method and from how different your users are. Where those participants come from is a third decision, and it shapes your results as much as the other two.

This page gives you a decision sheet that pairs each method with a starting number of people, a worked calculation for how many to screen, and five checks to run before fieldwork starts in Indian cities. We recruit participants and help run moderated studies (a facilitator guides each session live) for user experience (UX) and product teams, so the sheet is written for people who must find participants.

Which UX research methods fit your question and product stage?

Match the method to the kind of answer you need. Interviews, diary studies and field visits show why people behave as they do. Usability tests show whether a design works. Surveys, A/B tests and analytics count how many people do something. Early in a product, learn why. Later, test and measure.

Two ideas keep this straight. An attitudinal method records what people say; a behavioural method records what they do. Interviews are attitudinal, so they capture reported behaviour, not observed behaviour (Nielsen Norman Group, 2023). If a decision depends on what people actually do, pair interviews with a usability test or a field visit.

The product stage narrows the choice further (Nielsen Norman Group, Rohrer, 2022, reviewed July 2026):

  • Strategize: field studies, interviews and concept testing (checking an idea with users before it is built).
  • Design: usability testing, card sorting (people group topics into categories) and tree testing (people try to find items in a text-only menu).
  • Launch and assess: benchmarking (measuring a product against a baseline), A/B testing and analytics.

How many participants do interviews, diary studies, field visits and usability tests need?

Each method has a starting number and a trigger to raise it, set out in the sheet below. Raise the number only when your users differ from one another, and size surveys and A/B tests by the precision you need.

MethodWhat it answersStart withRaise it whenSource
In-depth interview (IDI), a one-to-one conversationWhy people do something, in their own words5 to 6 interviewsYour users are varied or the topic is broad: 20 to 30 or more, stopping when new interviews add no new themes
Diary study, where participants record activity over days or weeksWhat happens between sessions, over time5 to 12 for a small discovery project12 to 30 for a large discovery project; 30 to 50 for a large research or academic project
Field visit or ethnography, watching people in their home or workplaceHow things are used in real context4 to 6 households per segmentContexts differ by city, household or incomeOur recommendation
Usability test, watching people attempt tasksWhether a design works5 users per round, then fix and test againYou need numbers such as completion rates (the share of participants who finish a task): at least 20 users
Survey or A/B testHow many people do or prefer somethingSized by the margin of error you can accept, or the smallest difference you need to detectYou need a tighter margin or a smaller differenceStatistical sizing, not a fixed rule

Most method lists name methods but not participant numbers or Indian recruitment constraints.

Four notes on reading the sheet:

  • Saturation: the point where more interviews stop changing your themes. Start small, analyse as you go, and stop there.
  • Usability testing: spend extra budget on more rounds, not more users per round.
  • Diary studies: examples run from one to three weeks. Recruit extra people because some drop out, and pay more than you would for a single usability session (Nielsen Norman Group, 2024).
  • Choosing a usability format: our remote usability testing guide covers moderated against unmoderated (participants do it alone) formats. For the wider reasoning on qualitative samples, see Sample Size in Qualitative Research.

Does recruiting online in India skew your research sample?

Recruiting only through online, urban channels can skew an Indian research sample. As of June 2026, India had 129.03 internet subscriptions per 100 people in urban areas and 49.07 in rural areas. Urban density is about 2.6 times rural. That is the telecom regulator's own count for April to June 2026.

Rural areas hold 448.08 million of 1,114.17 million internet subscriptions, which is 40.2%. We worked out the 2.6 and the 40.2% by dividing the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's figures. Both count subscriptions, not unique people, so a figure above 100 per 100 means some people hold more than one connection (our inference).

The data does not measure how a sample skews. It does show where connections are concentrated. Our inference is that a remote-only study recruited through metro channels will under-represent a large share of connections. If your product serves tier-2, tier-3 or rural users, put at least one segment outside the metros and test on the phones and connections those users have.

Language works the same way. Treat each group you expect to behave differently, such as a city and language pair, as its own segment. Diverse samples sit at the top of the 20 to 30 or more interview range, not the bottom.

A young woman with a phone on a city balcony beside a farmer with a basic phone in a village lane.
Online, urban channels reach one kind of person, so rural and offline users can go missing from your sample.

How do you work out how many people to recruit and screen?

Work backwards from completed sessions. Divide by the share who show up to get bookings, then divide by incidence (the share of screened people who qualify) to get people to screen. The example below is our model with assumed rates, not an official figure.

Illustrative scenario. A team building an app on UPI (Unified Payments Interface) wants to understand first-time payers, then test a redesign.

  • Interview segments: 3 cities × 2 languages = 6 cells.
  • Interviews: budget 5 per cell, so 6 × 5 = 30. This sits inside the 20 to 30 or more range for varied users. Run in waves and stop early if later waves repeat earlier themes. At 60 minutes each, that is 30 hours of interviewing.
  • Usability tests: we keep the redesign test to one chosen segment (one city, one language), so 2 rounds × 5 users = 10 sessions. If you test more than one distinct user group, use 3 to 4 users per group per round (Nielsen Norman Group, 2012) and recompute the lines below.
  • Completed sessions: 30 + 10 = 40.
  • Assumed show-up rate: 80%. Bookings needed: 40 ÷ 0.8 = 50.
  • Assumed incidence: 20%. People to screen: 50 ÷ 0.2 = 250.

Swap in your own rates. If only 1 in 10 people qualifies, the same 50 bookings need 500 screened. Our incidence rate guide shows how to estimate the rate before you commit.

What should you check before UX fieldwork starts in Indian cities?

Run these five checks, each with a clear pass or fail, before the first session.

  1. 1
    Segment grid
    Pass: every city-and-language cell has a number, or a written reason for pooling it with another cell. Fail: one total with no split.
  2. 2
    Device and connection test
    Pass: one session runs cleanly on the oldest, cheapest phone and the weakest connection on your recruit list. Fail: you tested only on your team's phones.
  3. 3
    Behaviour screener
    Pass: each qualifying question asks what the person did, such as paying a bill through an app last week, not what they would do. Fail: any question answered by guessing the right answer.
  4. 4
    Consent

    Pass: each participant agrees in writing, before the session, to recording and to who will see it. Our informed consent guide has a form. Fail: consent taken after recording has started. As of November 2026, the DPDP Rules 2025 (notified 13 November 2025) make the notice and consent duties apply from 13 May 2027, so write consent notices to that standard now; see DPDP Act 2023 and Rules.

  5. 5
    Pilot session
    Pass: one full session fits the booked time and its notes answer at least one research question. Fail: the guide overruns or the notes answer none.

What does a moderated UX study with Qualfacto look like?

You send us a brief, we confirm the study is feasible, and we recruit, schedule and run it. Your brief covers the research objective, method, target audience, participant profile, city, sample size, usership, timeline and recruitment criteria. We then send a tailored proposal and quote.

We recruit for and run these formats:

  • In-depth interviews: one-to-one, 30 to 120 minutes, online or in person.
  • Focus groups: moderated, 1 to 3 hours, online or in person.
  • Digital diary studies: multi-day photo and video tasks on a mobile app or the web.
  • Ethnography: home visits or virtual sessions.
  • Usability and app testing: remote or lab-based.
  • Also available: online bulletin boards, shop-alongs, in-home use tests and opt-in digital behavioural tracking.

For the recruit, we can recruit by city, target by household and demographic profile, run sessions in languages other than English, supply moderators, and check participant identity before invitation. Studies may be run by us, by research partners or by other research organisations, depending on the project. Our approach is guided by the ethical principles of the Market Research Society of India and ESOMAR.

We recruit participants from our panel. People who want to take part in studies can register their interest through how to join and get invited; registration does not guarantee invitations, which depend on each study's requirements and the person's profile.

What you receive depends on the scope we agree before the study starts. It can include recruitment, fieldwork materials, recordings, transcripts, structured data exports and reports. We price each study as a project, with no fixed rate card, and we offer a free pilot or sample.

To start, email your brief to the Qualfacto team or message us on WhatsApp. We aim to reply within one business day (Monday to Friday, 10:00 to 18:00 India Standard Time); detailed briefs may take longer.

A moderator takes notes beside a participant using a phone while observers watch through a glass partition.
A moderated session pairs one participant with a moderator while the team observes without interrupting.

Send your brief and get a tailored UX study quote

Email your brief or message us on WhatsApp and we will confirm feasibility, then recruit, schedule and run your moderated study.
Send your brief

Frequently asked questions

Test 5 users per round, fix the problems, then test again. Use at least 20 users only when you need numbers such as completion rates, the share of participants who finish a task.
Start with 5 to 6 interviews and analyse as you go. Raise it to 20 to 30 or more when your users are varied.
Start with 5 to 6 interviews about a recent real task, then a usability test of your current design with 5 users. We recommend this pair because it covers why people behave as they do and whether your design works, at the smallest cost.
Yes for many methods, such as online interviews, remote usability tests and diary studies on mobile or web. Check each participant's device and connection first, and add in-person sessions or home visits where context matters. We run interviews online or in person, and usability tests remotely or in a lab.

We have no fixed rate card and quote each study as a project after reviewing your brief. Cost depends on the method, audience profile, sample size, geography, how hard the audience is to recruit and the scope. For the cost drivers and typical ranges, see user research recruitment cost in India. A free pilot is available.

Sources

  1. 1.When to Use Which User-Experience Research Methods, Nielsen Norman Group, Rohrer, published 17 July 2022, last reviewed 15 July 2026
  2. 2.How Many Participants for a UX Interview?, Nielsen Norman Group, Rosala, 31 October 2021
  3. 3.How Many Test Users in a Usability Study?, Nielsen Norman Group, Nielsen, 3 June 2012
  4. 4.Diary Studies, Nielsen Norman Group, Flaherty, 29 March 2024
  5. 5.User Interviews 101, Nielsen Norman Group, Rosala and Pernice, 17 September 2023, last reviewed 15 July 2026
  6. 6.The Indian Telecom Services Performance Indicators, April to June 2026, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, released 12 October 2026

Keep reading